New Geospatial Approaches to the Anthropological Sciences
edited by Robert L. Anemone and Glen C. Conroy
New Geospatial Approaches
                to the Anthropological Sciences

Chapter 6. Tooth Surface Topography. A Scale-Sensitive Approach with Implications for Inferring Dental Adaptation and Diet


PS Ungar

Additional Chapter details here

Figures

Fig. 1. Dental topography: a DEM of a chimpanzee tooth (upper left) and contour lines (upper right). Average surface slope (lower left) and aspect (lower right).

Fig. 2. Principal components analyses of upper M2 dental topography for platyrrhine monkeys with different primary diets (top) and for frugivores with different secondary diets (bottom). Sharpness, slope, angularity, and relief variables contribute the most to PC1, whereas OPC and patch size contribute the most to PC2. Specimens included here have "stage 1" slight wear. Data are from and further details can be found in Ungar et al., 2016.

Fig. 3. A dental microwear texture analysis: (A) a DEM of the teeth of a leaf-eating howler monkey; (B) a grass-eating gelada; (C) a hard-object-feeding capuchin; and (D) a hard-object-feeding mangabey; (E) area-scale tiling and (F) an area-scale fractal complexity plot of (a) a howler monkey and (b) a capuchin. Data originally reported in Scott et al., 2005; Scott, Teaford, and Ungar 2012.

Fig. 4. Dental microwear complexity values for Cercocebus atys from Tai and Lophocebus albigena specimens. Data from Daegling et al., 2011; Scott, Teaford, and Ungar 2012.